Maclean's rankings of health care indices in Canadian communities, 2000: comparisons and statistical contrivance.
نویسندگان
چکیده
A critical perspective is presented in regard to the 2000 regional rankings of Canadian health care indices by Maclean's magazine, June 5, 2000. This perspective is related in format to previous analyses of the Maclean's rankings of Canadian universities. Several pitfalls in the health care ranking procedures are summarized. The Maclean's data and general criteria appear conceptually reasonable, but their inconsistencies and limited range, together with problems in interpretation of rank data, do not allow them to be logically or empirically useful in the matter of health care evaluation, that is, in the manner portrayed for readers of Maclean's. Using a particular set of parameters defined as health "indicators," the rank data show gratuitously that communities better endowed with certain health services, such as those with medical schools, tend to provide higher levels of care.
منابع مشابه
Official language minority communities in Canada: is linguistic minority status a determinant of mental health?
OBJECTIVES Language has been identified as a determinant of mental health. Within Canada, individuals may speak an official language and still belong within the linguistic minority (Francophones outside Quebec and Anglophones within Quebec). The objectives of this study were to compare mental health problems between minority and majority official language communities, and examine the associatio...
متن کاملGoverning Collaborative Healthcare Improvement: Lessons From an Atlantic Canadian Case
The Atlantic Healthcare Collaboration for Innovation and Improvement in Chronic Disease (AHC) Quality Improvement Collaborative (QIC) in Eastern Canada provided an approach to spur system-level reform across multiple health systems for patients and families living with chronic disease. Developed and led by senior executives with a unique governance approach and involving clinical front-line tea...
متن کاملComparing inequalities in oral and general health: findings of the Canadian Health Measures Survey.
OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to measure and compare the magnitude of income-related inequalities for oral and general health outcomes in Canada. METHODS Data for this study were from the 2007/09 Canadian Health Measures Survey (CHMS). The sample size consisted of 3,413 Canadians aged 18-79 (1,601 men and 1,812 women). Oral health indicators were the total number of decayed and missing ...
متن کاملMultiple Comparisons with the Best: Bayesian Precision Measures of Efficiency Rankings*
A large literature measures the allocative and technical efficiency of a set of firms using econometric techniques to estimate stochastic production frontiers or distance functions. Typically, researchers compute only the precision of individual efficiency rankings. Recently, Horrace and Schmidt (2000) have applied sampling theoretic statistical techniques known as multiple comparisons with a c...
متن کاملAn international comparison of cancer survival: metropolitan Toronto, Ontario, and Honolulu, Hawaii.
OBJECTIVES Comparisons of cancer survival in Canadian and US metropolitan areas have shown consistent Canadian advantages. This study tests a health insurance hypothesis by comparing cancer survival in Toronto, Ontario, and Honolulu, Hawaii. METHODS Ontario and Hawaii registries provided a total of 9190 and 2895 cancer cases (breast and prostate, 1986-1990, followed until 1996). Socioeconomic...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
عنوان ژورنال:
- Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique
دوره 92 4 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2001